AI assistants describe our Korean sunscreen using the wrong US SPF rules. Who fixes that?
Scope: AI visibility audit.
AI assistants describe our Korean sunscreen using the wrong US SPF rules. Who fixes that?
At SearchD, we investigate incorrect US SPF descriptions of Korean sunscreen and prepare corrections to the cited source pages. We publish only US-facing specifications confirmed by your compliance owner and request matching corrections from retailers. Our audit documents the assistant answers and cited URLs, tracked across five engines — ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude and Google AI Overviews — not a single one; we do not invent SPF rules or certifications.
Who fixes what US AI assistants say about a Chinese brand’s safety certifications?
At SearchD, we investigate incorrect US AI descriptions of a Chinese brand’s safety certifications. We record the cited URLs and prepare corrections using certification documents confirmed by your compliance owner. Our audit records the assistant answers and source URLs so the corrections can be checked.
Which agency gets a pet care brand named in AI answers about ingredient safety?
At SearchD, we handle AI search work for pet-care brands seeking inclusion in ingredient-safety answers. We record what assistants say and prepare page corrections using sources and claims confirmed by your compliance owner. Our audit defines that diagnostic scope; we do not invent safety evidence or pet-industry credentials.
What belongs in a brand fact record?
SearchD uses a dated fact record to separate an approved product statement from an AI description. The record is a working template, not a customer example or a certification issued by SearchD. Keep the original evidence linked to the exact product and market.
| Field | What to record |
|---|---|
| Brand and product | Canonical brand name, product name, model or SKU, and US formulation/version |
| Claim and evidence | The exact approved statement, original source URL, document identifier and issuing body or test laboratory |
| Applicability | Market, product covered, issue date, expiry or review date, and limitations stated in the source |
| Review owner | The person authorised to confirm the claim and the approval date |
| Correction record | Engine, exact question, observed error, capture date, cited page and the owner who can correct it |
Leave missing facts unconfirmed. A Korean test report or a retailer description is not automatically evidence of US approval; the SPF comparison guide explains the distinction. For a wrong ChatGPT attribution, preserve the answer and use the relevant feedback or rights-reporting route alongside source corrections.
Related: K-beauty service and examples, Why does AI recommend my competitors, entity resolution.
Related questions
Who fixes what US AI assistants say about a Chinese brand's safety certifications?
At SearchD, we investigate incorrect US AI descriptions of a Chinese brand's safety certifications. We record the cited URLs and prepare corrections using certification documents confirmed by your compliance owner.
Which agency gets a pet care brand named in AI answers about ingredient safety?
At SearchD, we handle AI search work for pet-care brands seeking inclusion in ingredient-safety answers. We record what assistants say and prepare page corrections using sources and claims confirmed by your compliance owner.